Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1151820210150070983
Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
2021 Volume.15 No. 7 p.983 ~ p.989
Evaluation of Image Quality for 2D TSE(RT) and 3D GRASE in MRCP Study: Fast MRCP Method
Goo Eun-Hoe

Abstract
In this study, we intend to evaluate image quality and provide to clinical basic data by applying to 2D TSE (RT) and 3D GRASE (BH) techniques using Fast MRCP testing methods for application to patients in poor patient condition. Data were analyzed for 30 patients (15 males, 15 females, and 64¡¾4.26 average age) who underwent MRCP tests. The equipment used was Ingenia CX 3.0 T equipment and Ds anterior coil was used for data acquisition. SNR and CNR of each image were measured through quantitative analysis, and the quality of the image was evaluated by dividing it into 5 grades for qualitative evaluation. The image evaluation was performed on the paired t-test and the Wilcoxon test, and when the p value was 0.05 or less, it was considered to be significant. As a result of quantitative analysis of SNR and CNR, 3D GRASE (BH) was measured high when comparing the two techniques, 2D TSE (RT) MRCP and 3D GRASE (BH) (p<0.05). The qualitative analysis result is a sharpness of the bile duct: 3D GRASE(BH): 4.12¡¾0.03, Overall image quality: 3D GRASE(BH): 4.21¡¾0.91 was high (p=0.001). The motion artifact of the bile duct showed no significant difference with two techniques(2D TSE(RT): 4.41¡¾0.04, 3D GRASE(BH): 4.53¡¾0.14(p=0.067). However, the background suppression obtained significant results with 2D TSE(RT) of 4.14¡¾0.55(p=0.001). In conclusion, as a result of using the Fast MRCP testing method, MRCP images obtained by 3D GRASE (BH) had an advantage over MRCP images using 2D TSE (RT). However, there will be useful results of 2D TSE(RT) MRCP technique in patients who have difficulty holding their breath.
KEYWORD
TSE , 3D GRASE , RT , MRCP
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)